BY LOUIS ROSENFELD
|
|
et's start with a single, seemingly simple premise: A website's main page should
allow users to find the answers to basic questions. Amazingly, this fairly obvious rule
is often ignored.
Up until two weeks ago, General Motors was one information architecture's worst
offenders. While the main page one of the company's websites,
www.generalmotors.com, provided users with a wealth of important information, the
main page of the other, www.gm.com did precious little.
Unlike most main pages, which overwhelm the user with too much information,
www.gm.com consisted only of:
a link to www.generalmotors.com;
a link to the GM BuyPower site-GM's commerce site;
a separate link to GM BuyPower's special spring deals;
and, as of Feb. 7, 2000, a link to GM's North American Auto Show site, although, it should be noted, the show ended on Jan. 23, 2000.
The logo and logotype also served as a link, though not to
www.generalmotors.com, as you might expect, but to the Auto Show site.
So what lessons can we learn from the sparsely populated main page that was
www.gm.com?
A main page should provide answers to the most common questions that users bring
to the site. In the case of GM, visitors might want answers to questions such as:
How can I learn about GM's cars? How do I buy one?
Where can I find a special site for Chevrolet? Buick? Saab?
How do I invest (or keep track of my investments) in GM stock?
How can I (or my company) do business with GM?
How can I get a job at GM?
What's the news at GM these days?
But www.gm.com gave users only these facts:
You've reached GM. Now click on the link for www.generalmotors.com to go to GM.
We've got something called GM BuyPower. It may or may not help you do something.
By the way, there are current incentives for something.
We were at the North American Auto Show; wish you'd been there.
General Motors got its act together, and redirected www.gm.com, so that it now simply
points to www.generalmotors.com. GM could have
avoided these goofups by following some basic guidelines:
Talk to your customers. Find out what questions users have when they come to the site. Probably 80
percent of the time, they're asking the same few questions. Make sure that the
site's highest priority is to answer those questions.
Don't air your dirty laundry in public. Why did www.gm.com and www.generalmotors.com ever coexist as separate
pages, instead of pointing users to the same place as they now do? It made no
sense, especially when you visit www.generalmotors.com and find that it not only
contains all the same links as www.gm.com did, but it includes many more. The
www.generalmotors.com main page really does function better as a GM main
page, but many users (like me) who don't know better would have assumed that
www.gm.com was the main point of entry.
Why did GM drop the ball? The fault probably lays with some wrinkle in GM's interdepartmental
politics. Perhaps a public relations agency owned www.gm.com, while GM's
marketing department manages www.generalmotors.com in-house, and the two
VPs refused to work with each other since one misstated his handicap at the last
executive golf outing. Whatever the reason, this is a perfect example of an
information architecture that was planned with something other than the customer
in mind.
Labels really do matter. Corporations like GM pump unimaginable amounts of money and effort into their
major initiatives. In order to build internal support, not to mention buzz among the
media, these initiatives are dubbed with snappy names, like "GM BuyPower."
That's all well and good, but not everyone, especially those outside the
corporation, will have a clue about what those snappy labels mean.
Does "GM BuyPower," which was listed prominently on the front page of
www.gm.com with no attempt at explanation, mean that GM sells cars via the site?
Yes, and perhaps most users would figure this out. But dollars to donuts says that a
fair number of people took this to mean that GM had entered the power utility
business. Heck, GM provides financial services and lots of other stuff, so would
electricity and gas be such a wild guess?
GM should have provided some context that explained very briefly what "GM
BuyPower" is exactly. There was some descriptive text that appeared when you
placed your mouse on the link; why not make it more prominent? There was
plenty of white space on the page to sacrifice to usability.
General Motors thankfully corrected some major problems with what is
arguably the most influential interface between it and its customers. Rather than let the
existence of www.gm.com continue to jeopardize its whole web agenda, it (thankfully)
put it out of its misery.
Read previous installments of "A Closer Look."
|
|
|